Gluten-free Fearmongering – Coming Around Like Clockwork
Category: Health & Wellness
Another gluten study, another internet uproar.
This happens so regularly, you can almost set your watch by it.
What’s caused the fuss this time around? A study published in the BMJ, whose authors concluded, “the avoidance of gluten may result in reduced consumption of beneficial whole grains, which may affect cardiovascular risk. The promotion of gluten-free diets among people without celiac disease should not be encouraged.”
It’s becoming increasingly laughable that respected researchers are still arguing that some kind of harm might befall people without overt celiac disease who choose to avoid gluten anyway. Surely they’re aware of the growing body of evidence—not to mention several thousand patient case studies—demonstrating that one need not have their intestinal villi destroyed as the sole arbiter of intolerance to gluten. Sure, maybe that’s one of the most severe reactions to gluten in those who are sensitive to it, but let’s not negate its effects on the skin, its contribution to irritable bowel conditions, and its possible connection to schizophrenia. And that’s the short list! Gold-standard, placebo-controlled RCTs or not, healthcare professionals can no longer deny the list of nagging symptoms—some serious, others more mild—that patients report resolution of upon going gluten-free. Headaches, eczema, anxiety, lions, and tigers and bears, oh my! (Joking aside, you get the point.)
Let’s take a closer look at the BMJ study. It wasn’t “clinical” research; it was an epidemiological survey, based on food frequency questionnaires (FFQs), which are at best unreliable, and at worst, useless. This kind of data can be used to generate hypotheses, but not to prove cause and effect. In fact, in noting the poor quality of data from self-reported energy intake (EI) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE), researchers have written “that it is time to move from the common view that self-reports of EI and PAEE are imperfect, but nevertheless deserving of use, to a view commensurate with the evidence that self-reports of EI and PAEE are so poor that they are wholly unacceptable for scientific research on EI and PAEE.” Granted, they were writing in regard to caloric intake and physical activity, but there’s not much reason to believe self-reported food frequency should be any more reliable. FFQs are fraught with “systematic errors and biases in estimates.” Who consumed gluten? Who avoided it completely? Who ate only small amounts of it, and who ate wheat every chance they got? What else did they eat, and how much, how often? Can we ever really know what people eat unless they’re sequestered in a metabolic ward?
What, exactly, are these researchers afraid of? That individuals living with obesity, type-2 diabetes, and other effects of insulin resistance might do themselves harm by avoiding whole grain bread, pasta, muffins, fiber bars and breakfast cereal? There is nothing—not a single vitamin or mineral—present in gluten-containing grains that cannot be obtained from animal foods and non-grain plant foods, usually with a much lower glycemic impact, which is key for turning the tide on the exploding worldwide diabesity epidemic.
To its credit, BMJ published a well-written rebuttal to the study, whose authors noted, “Indeed, hominins consumed a grain-free diet from 2.6 million years ago to about 12,000 years ago, so it is highly unlikely that a gluten-free diet or Paleolithic diet is going to kill anyone long-term. In fact, grains are not essential, and contain no nutrient that cannot be obtained from other plant foods. Thus, it can be safely concluded that, whether gluten-free diet is indicated or not, it is not detrimental to avoid gluten.” Hard to say it any more clearly than that.
And to the credit of the study’s authors, they acknowledged several weaknesses and limitations in their data analysis, but, of course, that’s not what makes the headlines. What the headlines say is: “Do not avoid gluten unless you have celiac disease,” or, “Study shows that limiting whole grains as part of a reduced-gluten diet could actually increase heart attack risk in people without celiac disease.”
To be fair, there may be many people overly and unnecessarily “afraid” of gluten. The growing popularity of Paleo diets as well as low-carb and ketogenic diets has put the potential negative impacts of gluten consumption front and center on people’s radar like never before. (Even though the latter two diets are not by definition gluten-free.) And while gluten does negatively impact people who don’t have celiac disease, but who have a milder form of gluten sensitivity, this doesn’t mean that everyone should avoid gluten on principle. (Although some researchers do indeed make that case – that gluten affects intestinal barrier integrity in everyone, even if we don’t know it and are asymptomatic.) For people who experience no adverse effects from consuming gluten, there’s no need to go out of their way to avoid every molecule of this protein. Some might enjoy a bagel or slice of pizza now and then, and they certainly don’t need to worry about cross-contamination in restaurants or at social functions. So the unquestioning demonization of gluten might indeed be going too far, but that doesn’t mean it’s completely benign—let alone protective—for everyone without celiac disease.
Bottom line: some people simply feel better when they avoid gluten. Those who prefer to follow a gluten-free diet—whether or not they have celiac disease—shouldn’t be alarmed by fear-mongering research suggesting they’re putting themselves at risk for cardiovascular disease. It could easily be argued that if the gluten-containing items are replaced with nutrient-rich non-starchy vegetables, quality proteins and healthy fats, they could just as well decrease their cardiovascular risk.
By Amy Berger, MS, CNS
Author, The Alzheimer’s Antidote
THIS SITE DOES NOT PROVIDE MEDICAL ADVICE: None of the information on this site is intended or implied to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. All content, including text, graphics, images and information, contained on or available through this web site is for general information purposes only. EnFuse Fitness makes no representation and assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of information contained on or available through this web site, and such information is subject to change without notice. You are encouraged to confirm any information obtained from or through this web site with other sources, and review all information regarding any medical condition or treatment with your physician. Reliance on any information provided by EnFuse Fitness, its employees, others appearing on the site at the invitation of EnFuse Fitness, or other visitors to the site is solely at your own risk. NEVER DISREGARD PROFESSIONAL MEDICAL ADVICE OR DELAY SEEKING MEDICAL TREATMENT BECAUSE OF SOMETHING YOU HAVE READ ON OR ACCESSED THROUGH THIS WEB SITE.
We hope that you find this article helpful!
EnFuse Fitness, located in Enfield, Connecticut, is a veteran and family owned private personal training studio that offers pilates, massage, meal prep, and nutritional counseling services.
Proudly serving residents of western Massachusetts and northern Connecticut since 2010.
Gluten-free Fearmongering – Coming Around Like Clockwork. Amy Berger, MS, CNS, 29 June 2017. Web. 04 July 2017.
Latest NewsMore Articles